Title

body
 
xxx of yyy characters
Socialism

Watch this Topic   watch
Messages 

1-10 of 10

Close Topic

Reason

Message



 
Topic: hugo tsaves!!socialist or just a laicist??
im waiting for your opinion!!
Posted by Takis 
Mar 27, 2008
8:29 AM
hugo chaves, a typical latin politician, full of demagogy in a regimen pseudo-democratic... more plutocratic and oligarc... Retorically socialist, but not my way of seeing and living socialism...
Posted by Luis 
Mar 31, 2008
12:41 PM
Chávez is a revolutionary leader. He has been in struggle for years, even in jail againts a despotic government as was Carlos Andrés Pérez as president of Venezuela. It's difficult to be openly socialist in Latinamerica, because of the proximity with the USA. However Chávez has improved the conditions of workers, and has protected the interest of Venezuela and Latinamerica, wich have been abused and exploited for centurys. Fidel Castro didn't show himself openly socialist until que defeated Batista's army and won revolutionary war, what causes a conmotion in the USA. Socialism can't be dogmatic has a religion (like those guys of the Second International, 100 years ago), socialism should be open and self-criticisim, and every culture and nation will choose the way of socialism. Being dogmatic is acting like Bush and his "War against terrorism", who has the mesianic and stupid idea "All those who are not with us, are against us"... CIAO.
Apr 18, 2008
10:30 AM
Chaves es un berraco, como decimos los paisas, y no le teme a los gringos y quiere dignificar a su pueblo, no como Uribe que es un pobre titere de EEUU
Posted by Andres 
Apr 18, 2008
10:02 PM
ALL I KNOW IS THAT CHAVEZ AND VENEZUELA WOULDN`T SURVIVE IF IT WASN`T FOR THE US DOLLARS HE GETS FROM SELLING OIL.HE SHOULD BE A GOOD BUISSNES PARTNER AND BE THANKFUL FOR THE OIL VENEZUELA HAS.
SOCIALSM SEEKS EQUALITY,WELL, THAT`S IMPOSSIBLE SINCE WE ALL HUMAN BEINGS ARE NOT THE SAME(THAT WOULD BE SO BORING).
THERE`S HARD WORKING PEOPLE AND THERE`S LAZY PEOPLE ,SOME PEOPLE ARE SMART SOME PEOPLE AREN`T,AND SOME PEOPLE WANT TO BE RICH AND OTHER PEOPLE JUST DON`T. AND THAT`S THE WAY IT`S ALWAYS GOING TO BE.
SO, FOR SOCIALISM TO BE ABLE TO FUNCTION IN A SOCIETY, HAS TO EITHER ,FORCE ITS PEOPLE TO THINK THE SAME WAY AND WANT THE SAME THINGS(WICH IT`S BEEN PROVEN IMPOSSIBLE),OR WAIT UNTIL THE WHOLE SOCIETY ITSELF MOVES TOWARDS THAT WAY OF THINKING WICH ,WHO KNOWS,IT MIGHT HAPPEN,IN THE NEXT THOUSAND YEARS OR SO.FOR NOW,I JUST DON`T THINK SO...
Posted by Marco 
Apr 19, 2008
12:17 PM
Another guy who doesn't know the meaning of socialismo... LOL.
Apr 24, 2008
10:10 AM
IF YOU LIVED IN PERU IN THE 80`S ,THEN YOU WOULD KNOW WHAT I`M TALKING ABOUT CUTIE,YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I HAD TO GO THROUH DURING THOSE YEARS,ALL THAT THANKS O FUCKING EXTREMIST SOCIALISM..
Posted by Marco 
May 13, 2008
7:25 PM
Nobody cares what you had to go through. You don't know the meaning of the word socialism. Go to school and learn it, then you come back and try to teach us.
May 21, 2008
1:34 PM
I know you wouldn`t care ,you are RED .
Posted by Marco 
May 21, 2008
6:02 PM
Maybee the best thing to do would be to look at economic indicators


purchasing parity power

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity

GDP

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gdp

and Gini index

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_index

I'm guessing that the first two will decrease
and the last one wil increase in Venusuella under Chavez

I'll bet 100 euros over a ten year period!!!!!!!!
Jul 24, 2008
5:14 PM

I want to translate into: